If you’re new to the world of Big Data and distributed systems, the CAP Theorem is a fundamental concept you need to understand. It helps you make informed decisions when designing or choosing distributed systems.

​
What is the CAP Theorem?

The CAP Theorem states that in a distributed system, you can only guarantee two out of the following three properties at the same time:

  1. Consistency:

    • Every read receives the most recent write or an error.
    • All nodes in the system see the same data at the same time.

  2. Availability:

    • Every request receives a response, even if some nodes are down.
    • The system remains operational and responsive.

  3. Partition Tolerance:

    • The system continues to function even if there is a network partition (communication breakdown between nodes).

​
Why is the CAP Theorem Important?

In distributed systems, network partitions (e.g., delays, failures) are inevitable. The CAP theorem helps you decide how your system should behave in such scenarios. You must choose between Consistency and Availability when a partition occurs.

​
The Three Combinations

  1. CA (Consistency + Availability):

    • The system ensures Consistency and Availability but sacrifices Partition Tolerance.
    • Example: Traditional relational databases like MySQL or SQL Server.
    • Analogy: A library where every book is always in its correct place (consistent), but the library closes during maintenance (not partition-tolerant).
    • Use Case: Systems where data integrity is critical, and network partitions are rare (e.g., single data center setups).
    • A banking system where data consistency is critical. If a network partition occurs, the system may become unavailable to ensure data accuracy.

  2. CP (Consistency + Partition Tolerance):

    • The system ensures Consistency and Partition Tolerance but sacrifices Availability.
    • Example: Distributed databases like MongoDB (with strong consistency) or Apache HBase.
    • Analogy: A library where books are always in the correct place (consistent), but you can’t borrow books during maintenance (not available).
    • Use Case: Systems where data accuracy is more important than availability (e.g., financial systems).
    • A stock trading platform where real-time data accuracy is crucial. If a partition occurs, the system may reject requests to avoid inconsistencies.

  3. AP (Availability + Partition Tolerance):

    • The system ensures Availability and Partition Tolerance but sacrifices Consistency.
    • Example: NoSQL databases like Cassandra or DynamoDB.
    • Analogy: A library where you can always borrow books (available), but sometimes the books are misplaced (inconsistent).
    • Use Case: Systems where high availability is critical, and temporary inconsistencies are acceptable (e.g., social media platforms).
    • Social media platform: If a partition occurs, the system remains available, but users may see slightly outdated data.

​
Key Takeaways

  1. Trade-Offs:
    • You cannot have all three properties (Consistency, Availability, Partition Tolerance) simultaneously in a distributed system.
    • You must choose based on your system’s requirements.
  2. Partition Tolerance is Non-Negotiable: In distributed systems, network partitions are inevitable. Therefore, you must choose between Consistency and Availability.
  3. No One-Size-Fits-All Solution: The choice between CA, CP, or AP depends on your use case and priorities.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHqjEjzAicA

AvailabilityConsistency